I think communism is a pipedream, but this is just preposterous.
It could at least be written what Karl Marx actually theorised, not just pointless whit.
Ill sympathize with Marx right about the same time I start justifying Hitlers actions. Your logic is both flawed and ignorant of historic context. I don’t give a fuck what his theories are. I give a fuck how they were used to kill millions of innocent people in every hemisphere.
Marx and Engels wrote volumes on their ideas. It doesn’t take “whit”(?) to point out that they were monstrous.
In the Marxian journal Neue Rheinische Zeitung, Engels explained how the class war in Marxian terms means that when socialist revolution happens there will be primitive societies in Europe two stages behind in Marx’s Theory of History because at the time they were not even capitalist yet. He specifically mentions the Basques, the Bretons, Scottish Highlanders and the Serbs and he calls them “racial trash”. These are his exact words. He goes on to explain this “racial trash” will have to be destroyed during the class war because being two stages behind in the historical struggle it will be impossible to bring them up to the point of the revolution.
Marx himself stated that “The classes and the races too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way.” Marx. People’s Paper, April 16 1853,- That they must “perish in the revolutionary holocaust” Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 42 No.1 1981.
The people who defend Marx and Engels generally are the most ignorant people I come into contact with or the most devoid of humanity.
Here’s a video excerpt of leading Fabian socialist and Marxist sympathizer George Bernard Shaw advocating for mass murder;
Educate yourselves. Hitler learned from the Marxists. Nazism and Soviet Communism are slightly different interpretations of Marxism.
“Ill sympathize with Marx right about the same time I start justifying Hitlers actions.”
yeah, because they’re remotely comparable, sure - a political theorist and a genocidal dictator. let’s ignore the fact that marx was jewish as well, which makes this comparison even more offensive and ignorant.
“I don’t give a fuck what his theories are.”
then why did you make a verifiably false graph pretending to be based on his theories? if you’re going to condemn marx, do it, but don’t fucking pretend you’re representing him with this bullshit.
as for association-of-“free”-people, the usual libertarian tactics of quote-mining seem to be at work here. the “racial trash” remark is a mistranslation, the actual term is “residual fragments of peoples”, and engels was quoting hegel:
There is no country in Europe which does not have in some corner or other one or several ruined fragments of peoples, the remnant of a former population that was suppressed and held in bondage by the nation which later became the main vehicle of historical development. These relics of a nation mercilessly trampled under foot in the course of history, as Hegel says, these residual fragments of peoples always become fanatical standard-bearers of counter-revolution and remain so until their complete extirpation or loss of their national character, just as their whole existence in general is itself a protest against a great historical revolution. 
doesn’t sound so genocidal now does it? in fact, if anything, it sounds like engels considers the process of smaller nationalities being crushed by the capitalist state to be “merciless”.
the “classes and races” quote isn’t a mistranslation, but again is taken egregiously out of context:
But with modern compulsory emigration the case stands quite opposite. Here it is not the want of productive. power which creates a surplus population; it is the increase of productive power which demands a diminution of population, and drives away the surplus by famine or emigration. It is not population that presses on productive power; it is productive power that presses on population.
Now I share neither in the opinions of Ricardo, who regards ‘Net-Revenue’ as the Moloch to whom entire populations must be sacrificed, without even so much as complaint, nor in the opinion of Sismondi, who, in his hypochondriacal philanthropy, would forcibly retain the superannuated methods of agriculture and proscribe science from industry, as Plato expelled poets from his Republic. Society is undergoing a silent revolution, which must be submitted to, and which takes no more notice of the human existences it breaks down than an earthquake regards the houses it subverts. The classes and the races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way. But can there be anything more puerile, more short-sighted, than the views of those Economists who believe in all earnest that this woeful transitory state means nothing but adapting society to the acquisitive propensities of capitalists, both landlords and money-lords? 
it sounds here like he’s actually discussing what capitalism does, yet again, in crushing “weaker” classes and races. in fact he condemns ricardo for the very thing you’re accusing him of.
the “revolutionary holocaust” remark appears nowhere in marx and engel’s collected works, that i can find - in fact, the only discussions i could locate were on white nationalist websites. so much for you being an “anti-fascist” when you take your critique of communism from them.
as for george bernard shaw, he was a fabian, not a marxist, so i don’t know why he’s relevant here.
as usual, association-of-free-people, you’re a complete liar who can’t even be bothered to verify the shit they spout. how about we look at some of your heroes next? how about we pull up the ludwig von mises quote where he claimed fascism “saved” europe?
you didn’t provide sources for people to check your silliness, but i will.
Wait, you provide Marxist apologia in the face of results? I know all of the communists of the 20th century “did it wrong”. You are the liar, you are the rube who apologizes for holocaust and a brutal and murderous ideology even adding it to your ridiculous cartoonish moniker. You are as empty and lightweight as your persona projects. Grow up.
You bloviate in the face of reality. In just one instance we have Holodomor, the great effort at ethnic cleansing of Ukrainians by the Soviet communists led by Lenin? This genocide is a simple matter of fact and yet you presumably deny it.
Shaw isn’t relevant? Why? Because you say so? Where the hell do you think Fabian Socialist ideology sprung forth from? The same poisonous well that is Marxism. It is no Secret that the Fabian Society came into the world at the exact time that Marxism was the mainstream of the socialist surge. It attempted to put a Western face on the movement and instead of violent overthrow adopted a subversive set of tactics to meet their ends. This is no secret. Shaw actively praised the Soviets as well as the Fascists for their totalitarian socialist states “getting things done”.
You’re as disgusting as a nazi and don’t even realize it. You should be ashamed of yourself.
"Among all the nations and sub-nations of Austria [Austro-Hungarian Empire], only three standard-bearers of progress took an active part in history, and are still capable of life — the Germans, the Poles and the Magyars [Hungarians]. Hence they are now revolutionary. All the other large and small nationalities and peoples are destined to perish before long in the revolutionary holocaust. For that reason they are now counter-revolutionary. […] These residual fragments of peoples always become fanatical standard-bearers of counter-revolution and remain so until their complete extermination or loss of their national character. […] A general war will wipe out all these racial trash [völkerabfälle] down to their very names. The next world war will result in the disappearance from the face of the earth not only of reactionary classes and dynasties, but also of entire reactionary peoples. And that, too, is a step forward."
"The Magyar Struggle," Neue Rheinische Zeitung, January 13, 1849
Printed in English in the book: Karl Marx, The Revolutions of 1848, Political Writings Vol. 1, London, Penguin Books, 1973.
Mussolini claimed Karl Marx as the single largest influence on fascism and that the fascist ideology was doctrinally based on Marxism.
"What you understand by Socialism is nothing more than Marxism. —Hitler, spoken to Otto Strasser, Berlin, May 21, 1930 - Alan Bullock, Hitler: a Study in Tyranny, pp.156-7 He also asserted: "We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human are determined to destroy this system under all conditions. ” “There is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it. There is, above all, revolutionary feeling … I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the Party at once. The petit bourgeois Social Democrat and the trade-union boss will never be a National Socialist, but the Communist always will. ”
You see, I don’t need filtered translations spoon-fed to me from apologists and zealots decades removed from the history. I have their own words. We have recorded history. It does not all disappear down the memory hole so that you can enjoy your perverted erstwhile fantasies.
Go crawl back under your rock. As you know I equate you with a fascist. You are either an extremely ignorant or an evil human being.
god you’re fucking boring. i’m not going to bother responding to the parts of this which are insults and you having a giant tantrum, because it’d be a waste of time. you’ve reproduced the paragraph i put up, with the mistranslation intact, so i’m not even going to bother addressing that. the rest of your incoherent diatribe isn’t even based on marx and engels, it’s based on lenin, which is an entirely different argument altogether. but just so you know, just because someone is “influenced” by someone, doesn’t mean they’re an accurate representation of their ideas. plenty of capitalist thinkers from the 19th century influenced hitler, gobineau and spencer being good examples. i like how you take fascists at their word though, despite the fact hitler and mussolini regularly changed what they said depending on what audience they were speaking to.
same goes for shaw, him and his fabian arsehole friends vulgarized socialism and turned it into an ideology of class collaboration and eugenics, which had nothing to do with what marx said.
but lets be honest, the fascists once in power did nothing else than serve big business and protect private property with regards to the economy, much like you would. fascism is the ideological cousin of your school of “thought”